On Mon, 9 Sep 2024 16:24:03 +0200 Miroslav Suchý <msuchy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Dne 09. 09. 24 v 4:15 odp. Scott Talbert napsal(a): > > On Fri, 6 Sep 2024, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > > >> > >> Bellow is list of packages that have licenses that are neither valid as > >> Callaway nor as SPDX. I.e. the license cannot be validated neither using > >> 'license-validate' nor using 'license-validate --old'. > >> > >> swt2c perl-Data-Validate-IP > > > > I recently updated this package to use SPDX expressions: > > > > GPL-1.0-or-later OR Artistic-1.0 > > > > However, I'm just realizing that Artistic-1.0 is NOT a valid Fedora license, which is probably why the package ended > > up on this list. > > > > Since Fedora should be able to use this package under the GPL-1.0-or-later license, should I just update the License > > expression to that only? Or alternatively, should I request that "GPL-1.0-or-later OR Artistic-1.0" be added as an > > allowed license, as I see that "GPL-1.0-or-later OR Artistic-1.0-Perl" is in the list. > > I would not try adding Artistic-1.0 into allowed ones: > > https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues/254 > > https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues/37 > > You can talk to upstream. I recently witnessed that upstream used GPL-1.0-or-later OR Artistic-1.0 while they > **intended** to use GPL-1.0-or-later OR Artistic-1.0-Perl. thanks, "GPL-1.0-or-later OR Artistic-1.0-Perl" should fix collectl too Dan -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
