Re: [SPDX] packages that are "not valid neither as Callaway nor as SPDX"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 6 Sep 2024, Miroslav Suchý wrote:


Bellow is list of packages that have licenses that are neither valid as
Callaway nor as SPDX. I.e. the license cannot be validated neither using
'license-validate' nor using 'license-validate --old'.

swt2c      perl-Data-Validate-IP

I recently updated this package to use SPDX expressions:

GPL-1.0-or-later OR Artistic-1.0

However, I'm just realizing that Artistic-1.0 is NOT a valid Fedora license, which is probably why the package ended up on this list.

Since Fedora should be able to use this package under the GPL-1.0-or-later license, should I just update the License expression to that only? Or alternatively, should I request that "GPL-1.0-or-later OR Artistic-1.0" be added as an allowed license, as I see that "GPL-1.0-or-later OR Artistic-1.0-Perl" is in the list.

Thanks,
Scott
-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux