Dne 09. 09. 24 v 4:15 odp. Scott Talbert napsal(a):
On Fri, 6 Sep 2024, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Bellow is list of packages that have licenses that are neither valid as
Callaway nor as SPDX. I.e. the license cannot be validated neither using
'license-validate' nor using 'license-validate --old'.
swt2c perl-Data-Validate-IP
I recently updated this package to use SPDX expressions:
GPL-1.0-or-later OR Artistic-1.0
However, I'm just realizing that Artistic-1.0 is NOT a valid Fedora license, which is probably why the package ended
up on this list.
Since Fedora should be able to use this package under the GPL-1.0-or-later license, should I just update the License
expression to that only? Or alternatively, should I request that "GPL-1.0-or-later OR Artistic-1.0" be added as an
allowed license, as I see that "GPL-1.0-or-later OR Artistic-1.0-Perl" is in the list.
I would not try adding Artistic-1.0 into allowed ones:
https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues/254
https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues/37
You can talk to upstream. I recently witnessed that upstream used GPL-1.0-or-later OR Artistic-1.0 while they
**intended** to use GPL-1.0-or-later OR Artistic-1.0-Perl.
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
