Re: [SPDX] packages that are "not valid neither as Callaway nor as SPDX"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dne 06. 09. 24 v 1:57 odp. Daniel P. Berrangé napsal(a):
I need a class again on how to do this... I remember years ago being told
we should try to come up with what the effective license is, so if the

We (owners of the change) are indeed considering doing workshops on how to identify license. But we need the tooling that we will be using first.


package has sources that are both GPL-<X>-or-later and they have both GPL 2
and GPL 3 sources that the combination should be considered GPL-3-or-later.
No effective license analysis should be performed any more, as that
is removed from the guidelines, just list everything that is found.

*nod*

-- 
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux