Re: [SPDX] packages that are "not valid neither as Callaway nor as SPDX"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Sep 6, 2024 at 7:52 AM Richard Shaw <hobbes1069@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I need a class again on how to do this... I remember years ago being told we should try to come up with what the effective license is, so if the package has sources that are both GPL-<X>-or-later and they have both GPL 2 and GPL 3 sources that the combination should be considered GPL-3-or-later.
>
> Or should is it just be the kitchen sink method? (As long as the file makes it into the package)

See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/license-field/

-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux