On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 06:52:03AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > I need a class again on how to do this... I remember years ago being told > we should try to come up with what the effective license is, so if the > package has sources that are both GPL-<X>-or-later and they have both GPL 2 > and GPL 3 sources that the combination should be considered GPL-3-or-later. No effective license analysis should be performed any more, as that is removed from the guidelines, just list everything that is found. ie the following would be an permissible scenario under the new SPDX rules: GPL-2.0-only AND GPL-2.0-or-later AND GPL-3.0-only and GPL-3.0-or-later > Or should is it just be the kitchen sink method? (As long as the file makes > it into the package) The kitchen sink is desired ! With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
