Re: default `kernel.yama.ptrace_scope = 0` revisited. update to >=1 ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday, August 14, 2024 10:26:29 PM EDT pgnd wrote:
> > It not an analysis; it's a confession. I'm probably the person most
> > closely connected to this.
> 
> heh 
> 
> it'd be useful to have the default switched to =1 _and_ have the "the sky
> will fall!" comments docs changed, or at least softened.

The comments from 2015 I don't think are relevant. I'd suggest to look at the 
prevalence of DISA STIG requirements and successes instead. I don't think the 
sky will fall is relevant. I have a feeling, no proof to support this 
conjecture , that this was "good advice" based on the understanding at the 
time.

> it'd be helpful if the 'password manager' types engage in some dialog
> _first_ ...
> 
> in any case, it's 'flagged' here, so I can at least see the problem coming.

I have no idea what this is or care to. This should stand on a simple 
argument.

-Steve


-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux