On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 08:01:11PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > FESCo is an elected body. If people aren't happy with how they are being > represented, I would encourage them to find candidates they feel will > represent their interests better and get them to run for election. Having FESCo empowered in this way has always felt unhealthy to me, and I don't find it surprising that there is resentment toward decisions which go against perceived community consesus - I frequently feel exactly the same. I don't think that "if you don't like the system, stop complaining or go away" should be the only way we respond to this. Having a "majority rule" vote of e.g. packagers or provenpackagers on major technical decisions would be far superior, in my view. Apache communities have worked this way forever. Regards, Joe -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
