On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 13:03 -0400, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On 10/21/05, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The FHS and the GNU-standards are fairly widely accepted standards in > > the OSS, Linux and GNU world. > The context was... packaging standards.... which i'm pretty sure isn't > covered in the venerable standards you mention. Both the FHS and GNU-standards give recipes from "choosing installation directories" and what to install where. To me, this makes at least 3/4's of packaging. I guess you want to re-read the FHS http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html and the GNU-standards http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/standards.html > >As others already mentioned, the LSB's > > importance is arguable/questionable - Fact is, its importance so far has > > been almost negligible. > > I'm not going to argue its worth, but it is the only attempt at a > standard that I am aware of that actually covers packaging.. Then we probably have a different notion on packaging. :) Ralf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
