On 10/21/05, Mike Hearn <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > And for what it's worth, last time I asked the LSB guys how many LSB RPMs > were "in the wild", the answer was perhaps two or three. So it's more a > de-jure standard than a de-facto standard. Please point to a standard de-factor or otherwise with wide acceptance.... in the linux space at large....that you are using to measure fedora's packages against. Different groups have has their own ideas in this space...i'd even call it a vibrant space full of competing ideas. Please refrain from making it sound like Fedora is well off the map compared to other distributors. -jef"catch more flies with honey"spaleta -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
