On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 12:09 -0400, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On 10/21/05, Mike Hearn <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > And for what it's worth, last time I asked the LSB guys how many LSB RPMs > > were "in the wild", the answer was perhaps two or three. So it's more a > > de-jure standard than a de-facto standard. > > Please point to a standard de-factor or otherwise with wide > acceptance.... The FHS and the GNU-standards are fairly widely accepted standards in the OSS, Linux and GNU world. As others already mentioned, the LSB's importance is arguable/questionable - Fact is, its importance so far has been almost negligible. Ralf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
