Re: Strange directory ownership in RPM database

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 17:54:38 +0200, Christoph Karl via devel wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> Thank you for the clarification.
> How about two different packages which do not depend on each other
> having both files/directories below /xyz/?
> I assume in this case co-ownership of /xyz/ should be used?
> 
> Is this rule general valid or are there exceptions?
> 
> Icon sizes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2284088
> 
> Localization: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279766

Directory ownership is a MUST in the guidelines for many years:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_file_and_directory_ownership
-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux