Hi!
Thank you for the clarification.
How about two different packages which do not depend on each other
having both files/directories below /xyz/?
I assume in this case co-ownership of /xyz/ should be used?
Is this rule general valid or are there exceptions?
Icon sizes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2284088
Localization: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279766
Thank you
Best regards
Christoph
Am 10.07.24 um 16:47 schrieb Jerry James:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 2:02 AM Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
However, based on that one cannot conclude who may have created /usr/lib/qt6
on your machine. It may be some other package that stores files in a
directory _below_ (!) /usr/lib/qt6 and owns files there. It would be a
packaging mistake. Query ownership of files below /usr/lib/qt6.
That's exactly it.
$ ls /usr/lib/qt6
plugins qml
$ rpm -qf /usr/lib/qt6
file /usr/lib/qt6 is not owned by any package
$ rpm -qf /usr/lib/qt6/plugins
file /usr/lib/qt6/plugins is not owned by any package
$ rpm -qf /usr/lib/qt6/plugins/kf6
kf6-filesystem-6.3.0-1.fc40.x86_64
$ rpm -qf /usr/lib/qt6/qml
file /usr/lib/qt6/qml is not owned by any package
$ rpm -qf /usr/lib/qt6/qml/org
file /usr/lib/qt6/qml/org is not owned by any package
$ rpm -qf /usr/lib/qt6/qml/org/kde
kf6-filesystem-6.3.0-1.fc40.x86_64
The kf6-filesystem package is creating and owning directories without
owning the parents of those directories. The same is true of the
kf5-filesystem package.
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
