On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 08:47:32 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> That's exactly it.
>
> $ ls /usr/lib/qt6
> plugins qml
> $ rpm -qf /usr/lib/qt6
> file /usr/lib/qt6 is not owned by any package
> $ rpm -qf /usr/lib/qt6/plugins
> file /usr/lib/qt6/plugins is not owned by any package
> $ rpm -qf /usr/lib/qt6/plugins/kf6
> kf6-filesystem-6.3.0-1.fc40.x86_64
> $ rpm -qf /usr/lib/qt6/qml
> file /usr/lib/qt6/qml is not owned by any package
> $ rpm -qf /usr/lib/qt6/qml/org
> file /usr/lib/qt6/qml/org is not owned by any package
> $ rpm -qf /usr/lib/qt6/qml/org/kde
> kf6-filesystem-6.3.0-1.fc40.x86_64
>
> The kf6-filesystem package is creating and owning directories without
> owning the parents of those directories. The same is true of the
> kf5-filesystem package.
Though, there's something fishy about that, since a Qt "plugins"
directory sounds much like it ought to be included in a Qt package,
not a KDE "filesystem" package. Just like it's done for x86_64, e.g.:
$ rpm -qf /usr/lib64/qt6/{plugins,qml}
qt6-qtbase-6.7.2-2.fc40.x86_64
qt6-qtdeclarative-6.7.2-1.fc40.x86_64
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
