Solomon Peachy wrote: >> But with that knowledge comes the ability to work for a va- >> riety of organizations who will spend many resources on >> nudging their users to behave in a way that is not necessar- >> ily in their best interests. > What does "a developer's ability to choose who they work for" have to do > with end-user's ability to trust (and verify!) what data is being sent > (or not) to Fedora? Developers might not want to work for a project any longer that engages in behaviour that is perceived as being at odds with why they chose to work for that project in the first place. > Because what you're describing is a complete non-sequiter, and > represents what has been the status quo for most of Humanity's history. > No metrics necessary, because who cares what the peasants actually want? Looking at the proposed metrics (https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/blob/master/f/notes/metrics-to-collect.md), the "peasants" who do not form part of the majority of the users might indeed worry about how bug reports, etc. are processed if they (objectively) only affect x % of all in- stallations. Tim -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
