Hi, > On 5. Jul 2024, at 14:24, Peter Pentchev <roam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I wonder if it would be possible (of course it is technically possible, > more like how hard it would be) to make the OpenSSL devel package > conditionally define OPENSSL_NO_ENGINE if another package is > not installed. I can think of at least two ways to do that: > - alternatives (but maybe that's my Debian background talking) > - #include_next games That’s just -DOPENSSL_NO_ENGINE_BUT_ACTUALLY_I_REALLY_STILL_WANT_TO_USE_THIS_DEPRECATED_FUNCTIONALITY but with extra magic so package maintainers only have to add BuildRequires: openssl-devel-engine instead of adding a preprocessor define. It also has the same downside of silently disabling engines if the maintainer doesn’t check. -- Clemens Lang RHEL Crypto Team Red Hat -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
