On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 02:05:38PM +0200, Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote: > In the long-term it would be better to provide a patch fixing build of the > package. Probably adding -DOPENSSL_NO_ENGINE to build flags will work. > Engines are deprecated. You should not use engines and should migrate to > providers. I really think this is silly. Looking at the Boost headers they already conditionalize support for ENGINE *in the way that OpenSSL upstream intended*. https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_74_0/boost/asio/ssl/detail/openssl_types.hpp #if !defined(OPENSSL_NO_ENGINE) # include <openssl/engine.h> #endif // !defined(OPENSSL_NO_ENGINE) So, no, Boost should not be "fixed". <openssl/configuration-*.h> should simply "#define OPENSSL_NO_ENGINE" if you want Fedora packages to drop ENGINE support. We have broken the way Fedora packages consume the OpenSSL API - it should be reverted, we're just heaping unnecessary work on other package maintainers. Regards, Joe -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
