On 01/07/2024 20:07, Aoife Moloney wrote:
I would also like to add that we deliberately took a positive tone for this survey as it is far too easy to find (many) negatives for AI (and for good reason!), and we wanted to try to look at the benefits we could get from AI instead if applied properly and wit the best interest of Fedora driving the use of AI in parts of the projects ecosystem.
Well I guess if you're only interested in positive responses then we can say the survey design is a success - just a shame that the results will be meaningless. I understand why surveys have to use closed form questions with a fixed set of responses but it should always be possible to opt out of questions and, ideally, to explicitly indicate that you do not agree with any of the proposed responses, otherwise you are artificially restricting the results to the set of concepts that were (either deliberately or subconsciously) in the mind of the survey creator. At the very least the question needs to be changed to not indicate that two answers are required if five are! Tom -- Tom Hughes (tom@xxxxxxxxxx) http://compton.nu/ -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
