On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 10:32 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 25/06/2024 15:06, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > I am not a lawyer, but I would assume that if Fedora offered to > > provide such a token, it would be reviewed by Legal and provide some > > form of legally-binding assertion that we weren't sending out > > malicious devices. > > Who can guarantee that these devices were not replaced during delivery? > > > In that situation, the > > provenpackagers would be making a three way decision: 1) Stop being a > > provenpackager, 2) buy their own token or 3) accept one provided by > > Fedora. > > 4. Allow classic OTP codes. > > I would prefer this one since I can use open source applications to > generate these codes. I can't find any FIDO2 implementations that are > completely open source which doesn't require proprietary technologies > like TPM or SGX. Relying on a black box is not an option for me. > No one said otherwise. This hypothetical started from "what if we required physical tokens?", so I was noting the possibilities under that restriction. -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
