On 25/06/2024 15:06, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
I am not a lawyer, but I would assume that if Fedora offered to
provide such a token, it would be reviewed by Legal and provide some
form of legally-binding assertion that we weren't sending out
malicious devices.
Who can guarantee that these devices were not replaced during delivery?
In that situation, the
provenpackagers would be making a three way decision: 1) Stop being a
provenpackager, 2) buy their own token or 3) accept one provided by
Fedora.
4. Allow classic OTP codes.
I would prefer this one since I can use open source applications to
generate these codes. I can't find any FIDO2 implementations that are
completely open source which doesn't require proprietary technologies
like TPM or SGX. Relying on a black box is not an option for me.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vitaly@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
