Re: Guidance on individual packages requiring x86_64-v2 baseline ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 3:52 PM Chris Adams <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Once upon a time, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> said:
> > three) and recommend creation of a Fedora "Hardware Life Extension"
> > Remix that can provide rebuilds of (a subset of) Fedora that they want
> > to run on ancient hardware.
>
> TBH I feel that approach would be doomed to the same failure as the
> attempts to extend Fedora life-cycles.  There's enough people that would
> want it, but not necessarily the critical mass needed to do the work to
> make it happen.

Which may be OK, and therefore a success, in that
the community has spoken by their lack of interest
in actually doing (or making an arrangement with
someone else for the doing).  To give those who
might be interested in creating a critical mass one
should provide an extended period of time for
the change (I would suggest a year, so a F43
change proposal for -v2?) and see if those interested
can achieve criticality.
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux