Re: small logic issue with system upgrades

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 22.05.24 um 17:48 schrieb Alexander Sosedkin:
On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 4:34 PM Marius Schwarz <fedoradev@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Were you following the steps outlined in
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/upgrading-fedora-offline ?


I'm under the impression, there is a small misunderstanding here: The upgrade worked as it should for the 23th time in a row :D

It's just, that > while < the upgrade process was running, there was the risk, that it or the connection fails, and in that case, there would not have been a way to fix it remotely because of the mismatch of openssl and openssh versions. (yes of course, an IPMI would be a way ).

The risk that this happens can be shrunken immense, if openssh and openssl would be updated in direct serial order.

Yes, this is only relevant for remote-upgrades, but Fedora is a very good server distribution and widely spread ;)

best regards,
Marius Schwarz
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux