Re: Debugging fun (wrt C modernization change)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Kevin Kofler via devel venit, vidit, dixit 2024-05-16 22:39:00:
> Panu Matilainen wrote:
> > Patch and source numbers start from zero, that goes for automatically
> > numbered patches too. So there's an off by one in the application, and
> > the latter %autopatch which is supposed to apply patches >= 2 simply has
> > nothing to do, and falls through silently. That's a bug of course in
> > itself, filed now:
> > https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3093
> 
> And then they say the automagic is a good idea because it prevents people 
> from accidentally forgetting to apply a patch, LOL.

This would not have happened with autosetup. If you overwrite
automatisms (using invidual patch numbers and flags) you need to know
what you are doing. So this is a very weak argument:
 
> %patchlist and %auto* should just go away, or at least banned from Fedora by 
> a git hook rejecting such specfiles.

We also have unnumbered patch source definition lines, don't we?

Michael
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux