>>>>> "RS" == Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: RS> Counting the number of occurances of the word is misleading since RS> it appears in the spec comments several times. I don't believe it can be both in a comment and at the beginning of a line, since the spec file format does not have block comments. I could not find a single match that wasn't the direct application of a patch. If you have evidence to the contrary, I invite you to enlighten me. RS> You need to look into the source rpm or RS> http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com and count the actual number of RS> patches. As I said, I am looking at a current CVS checkout. However, if you just count the patch files, you may be counting some that aren't applied in the current .spec, such as linux-2.6-debug-detect-softlockups.patch, which appears in a current CVS checkout and in the SRPM but is not actually applied by the current spec. Anyway, it's a trivial matter so I apologize for spamming. But I relly did try to engage my brain before posting, and I do have at least a bit of experience doing this. - J< -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
