Re: RFC: Flaws detected by static analyzers in Fedora 41 Core Critical Path Packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 2:12 AM Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez <carlosrodrifernandez@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Siteshwar,

Thank you for the report. The libcap subtask failed [1] for a known
issue, which is present in libcap 2.69-3 in Fedora rawhide, but was
already fixed two weeks ago. Fedora rawhide has 2.69-8, and I can
confirm it is the case when I run the fedora:41 images. 2.69-8 should
have been in the mirrors for more than one week. I'm surprised it wasn't
picked up when this report was run. Will the report be rerun eventually
with an updated version of Fedora 41?

I plan to run the mass scans again based on the feedback from the community. Although, I do not have a timeline for that. I would appreciate any suggestions on when it fits in the Fedora release schedule to run a mass scan.
 

Thank you,
Carlos R.F.

[1] https://openscanhub.fedoraproject.org/task/135/log/stdout.log


On 4/24/24 09:26, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is a follow up on my previous email[1] about OpenScanHub Prototype
> for Fedora.
> Thank you to those who have provided early feedback. Your help is truly
> appreciated!
>
> I am writing this message to get feedback from the community on possibly
> new defects identified by static analyzers in Core Critical Path
> packages that have changed in Fedora 41.
>
> TLDR: This report[2] contains 14188 identified defects. Please review
> the report and provide feedback.
>
> A mass scan was performed this week on the packages that have changed in
> Fedora 41. This report[2] contains all the new defects that have been
> identified in the core packages listed in Critical Path Packages. Please
> review the report and fix or report any defects to upstream that may be
> real bugs. Not all defects reported by OpenScanHub may be actual bugs,
> so please verify reported defects before investing time into fixing or
> reporting them. We hope this is helpful for the packages you maintain
> and for the upstream projects. Questions can be asked on the OpenScanHub
> mailing list[3]. If you want to see the full logs of the scans, they are
> available on the tasks[4] page. User documentation for performing a scan
> is available on the Fedora wiki[5].
>
> If the feedback on this report is positive, there may be a possibility
> of increasing the scope of scans to cover a wider range of packages.
>
> Please remember this is currently an early production stage for
> OpenScanHub scanning. Constructive feedback is appreciated. Thank you!
>
> [1]
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/OMKLJFW4VC242QSA7R4KMGI6IGBT3YLM/ <https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/OMKLJFW4VC242QSA7R4KMGI6IGBT3YLM/>
>
> [2] https://svashisht.fedorapeople.org/f41-22-Apr-2024/
> <https://svashisht.fedorapeople.org/f41-22-Apr-2024/>
>
> [3]
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/openscanhub@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ <https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/openscanhub@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/>
>
> [4] https://openscanhub.fedoraproject.org/task/
> <https://openscanhub.fedoraproject.org/task/>
>
> [5] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/OpenScanHub
> <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/OpenScanHub>
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux