Hi Siteshwar,Thank you for the report. The libcap subtask failed [1] for a known issue, which is present in libcap 2.69-3 in Fedora rawhide, but was already fixed two weeks ago. Fedora rawhide has 2.69-8, and I can confirm it is the case when I run the fedora:41 images. 2.69-8 should have been in the mirrors for more than one week. I'm surprised it wasn't picked up when this report was run. Will the report be rerun eventually with an updated version of Fedora 41?
Thank you, Carlos R.F. [1] https://openscanhub.fedoraproject.org/task/135/log/stdout.log On 4/24/24 09:26, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote:
Hello,This is a follow up on my previous email[1] about OpenScanHub Prototype for Fedora. Thank you to those who have provided early feedback. Your help is truly appreciated!I am writing this message to get feedback from the community on possibly new defects identified by static analyzers in Core Critical Path packages that have changed in Fedora 41.TLDR: This report[2] contains 14188 identified defects. Please review the report and provide feedback.A mass scan was performed this week on the packages that have changed in Fedora 41. This report[2] contains all the new defects that have been identified in the core packages listed in Critical Path Packages. Please review the report and fix or report any defects to upstream that may be real bugs. Not all defects reported by OpenScanHub may be actual bugs, so please verify reported defects before investing time into fixing or reporting them. We hope this is helpful for the packages you maintain and for the upstream projects. Questions can be asked on the OpenScanHub mailing list[3]. If you want to see the full logs of the scans, they are available on the tasks[4] page. User documentation for performing a scan is available on the Fedora wiki[5].If the feedback on this report is positive, there may be a possibility of increasing the scope of scans to cover a wider range of packages.Please remember this is currently an early production stage for OpenScanHub scanning. Constructive feedback is appreciated. Thank you![1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/OMKLJFW4VC242QSA7R4KMGI6IGBT3YLM/ <https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/OMKLJFW4VC242QSA7R4KMGI6IGBT3YLM/>[2] https://svashisht.fedorapeople.org/f41-22-Apr-2024/ <https://svashisht.fedorapeople.org/f41-22-Apr-2024/>[3] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/openscanhub@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ <https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/openscanhub@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/>[4] https://openscanhub.fedoraproject.org/task/ <https://openscanhub.fedoraproject.org/task/>[5] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/OpenScanHub <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/OpenScanHub>-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
