On Sat, 2024-04-13 at 18:17 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 06:00:41PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > This should have been an announced Change. This is a significant > > > change with wide impact. > > > > I've filed a bug, proposed it as a blocker, and filed a FESCo ticket > > asking FESCo to designate the bug as a blocker. > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2274830 > > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3196 > > I admit I was also initially surprised. But, this actually has been going > through the Change process for a while: > > F33: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NetworkManager_keyfile_instead_of_ifcfg_rh > F36: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NoIfcfgFiles > F39: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/MigrateIfcfgToKeyfile I would argue that it has not. Those Changes are all about the NetworkManager plugin that reads ifcfg files. The network service - /etc/init.d/network - is a different thing. They may be tied together in the maintainers' minds, I don't know, but they are not tied together technically and none of those Changes, IMHO, at all clearly conveys "the network service is going away in Fedora 40". -- Adam Williamson (he/him/his) Fedora QA Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @adamw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://www.happyassassin.net -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
