Zbyszek
While I am in favor of autospec, I agree with the comment that it
doesn't work well outside of koji.
- builds in copr work.
The builds themselves work, but in my experience they do not increase
the `release`, nor do they handle `autochangelog`. Are there ways around
it if we want `copr` to be a pre-release/testing environment?
Cristian
On 2024/04/08 10:43, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 12:58:04PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
No. I do not want to use rpmautospec as it currently exists. It does
not help me. It does not achieve anything for me. It breaks my
packages for building outside of Fedora Koji. It doesn't even make
things better for supporting automation.
I do not want to use it unless I absolutely have to (e.g. Rust
packages since rust2rpm sets it up that way).
-100.
No. I do not want to use this unless it is finally fixed to enable
rebuild automation. And since that will not happen anytime soon, I
have no compelling reason to use it and tremendous disadvantages
otherwise. It makes building things in COPR terrible, it makes
building things locally annoying, and I can't use it at all reasonably
in non-VCS oriented build systems.
Neal,
I appreciate the work you with other distributions, but in this case,
you're essentially saying that you'll hold Fedora hostage in order
to force some unrelated changes that have no consensus.
In particular:
- local builds work, I do them all the time, with 'fedpkg local' or
through an srpm.
- builds in copr work.
- "non-VCS oriented build systems" — building from srpm works, so they
probably actually work, but anyway, it's 2024, we want more version
control, not less.
- if you want automated rebuilds, please make a proposal and open a
new dicussion. Don't beat up on rpmautospec.
And we already have a significant fraction of packages using rpmautospec,
so you must have _some_ solution in place that works for those packages.
Even if rpmautospec doesn't fit those external workflows nicely, maybe
even you would benefit if it is used consistently, because then you
can apply the same (adjusted) workflow everywhere?
Zbyszek
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
