Otto Liljalaakso kirjoitti 30.3.2024 klo 13.41:
Kevin Kofler via devel kirjoitti 25.3.2024 klo 20.34:
Miroslav Suchý wrote:
I want to highlight that we have policy for removing policy
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Retirement_Process/#complete_removal
which at the end mention adding the package to
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fedora-obsolete-packages
I do not think the "Completely Removing a Package" section is meant
for the cases you mention. The only example given in that section is
licensing issues, i.e. a situation where Fedora was actually not even
allowed to distribute the package, either because of the license
conditions, or because of Fedora's own bylaws.
On the other hand, you do not have to refer to that section if you
want to remind packages about fedora-obsolete-packages. Right before
there is "Obsoleting Packages", which asks to consider obsoleting for
every retirement.
In attempt to make it more clear that obsoleting should be considered
every time a package is retired, I submitted a pull request for Package
Maintainer Docs [1].
[1]: https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/package-maintainer-docs/pull-request/152
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
