On 2/1/24 11:28 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 4:21 PM Roberto Ragusa <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2/1/24 14:29, Steve Cossette wrote:
And yes, that /is/ the whole point: We want to foster the use of Wayland, to increase it's adoption, to force people using it to hit snags along the road and fill tickets so those issues can be fixed.
"force people" "hit snag"
With this kind of attitude, don't be surprised when people describe Fedora
as "the beta test" for Red Hat.
To put it bluntly: KDE is not part of RHEL and Red Hat couldn't care
less about KDE. A "beta test" for Red Hat is pretty useless when it
has basically no impact for Red Hat, positively or negatively.
We are doing this because without doing so, the gaps will *never* be
identified to be fixed in the first place. And they *are* getting
fixed at a rapid clip.
I'd like to think that the gaps will be fixed, but it seems to me that because of policy, some gaps (like apps controlling their own window placement) will never be fixed.
Is there a way to see what gaps remain, which ones are being worked on, and which ones will be declared "not a gap - won't fix"?
Steve
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
