On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 08:45:37AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > One additional point I forgot to address: the initial concern was that > the KDE SIG would be implicitly responsible for maintaining these > packages if they are included in the main repository. From a purely > technical perspective, I think that we should state clearly that the > KDE SIG would be required only to provide advance notice of major > changes but would NOT be responsible for ensuring that these packages > adapt to them. Of course, communicating that to users is harder (and > they'll naturally report bugs to the wrong place in many cases), but I > think the KDE SIG is completely permitted to refuse and retarget any > issues that come up to the appropriate group. > > > > My proposal for consideration is this: > > "FESCo will allow these packages in the main Fedora repositories, > > however they may not be included by default on any release-blocking > > deliverable (ISO, image, etc.)" I think we should reword this proposal to address this point: "FESCo will allow these packages in the main Fedora repositories, however they may not be included by default on any release-blocking deliverable (ISO, image, etc.). The KDE SIG should provide a notice before major changes, but is NOT responsible for ensuring that these packages adapt." Zbyszek -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
