Re: Proposal: Eliminate buildroot overrides

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 1:55 PM Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> * Stephen Gallagher:
>
> > I am unaware of any remaining use cases for buildroot overrides that
> > are not covered by side tags. If you know of any, please speak up.
>
> The overrides are more discoverable:
>
>   <https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/overrides/?expired=False>
>

> With side tags, you really have to know the name, or you won't be able
> to find it.  On the other hand, you can just make your own and tag the
> builds into it, so creating yet another one isn't that much of a problem
> because they expire evenutally, just like overrides.
>


What does that gain you, though? I'm not clear on the use-case here.
Generally when there's a multi-packager effort going on for a
side-tag, it's coordinated by mail or IRC between people. I'm not sure
when you'd need to "discover" it.
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux