Re: Proposal: Eliminate buildroot overrides

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 1:53 PM Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> * blinxen:
>
> >> I am unaware of any remaining use cases for buildroot overrides that
> >   are not covered by side tags
> >
> > One use case that I sometimes encounter is requiring a newer version
> > for a dependency, that is submitted to Bodhi with a side-tag. Since
> > the build is in a side-tag, I can't access it without building into
> > that specific side-tag. Also I can't stop the Bodhi Update just to add
> > my own build. In this case, I need to create a buildroot override to
> > be able to build my package in my own side-tag.
>
> I think you can tag that build into your side tag?  This should require
> provenpackager privileges, as far as I understand it.
>

Yes, if you have privileges on the other package, I think you can just
do `koji tag <my-side-tag> N-V-R`
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux