On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 11:20 AM Nick Clifton <nickc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi David, Hi Florian, > > >>>> Here's the bug: > >>>> > >>>> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31179 > >>>> RISC-V: The SET/ADD/SUB fix breaks ABI compatibility with 2.41 objects > >>>> > >>>> It refers to this change in binutils 2.41: > >>>> > >>>> https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=73d931e560059a87d76f528fafbb4270a98746bc > > FYI, a second patch is also needed: "RISC-V: Clarify the behaviors of SET/ADD/SUB relocations." > This is commit: 2029e13917d53d2289d3ebb390c4f40bd2112d21 Yes. This one is the actual fix. The one mentioned above is a temporary workaround to accept older broken object files. > > > > In Fedora/RISCV we typically end up using the latest available > > binutils. We are slightly different from upstream/normal Fedora. > > I have now backported both of the above commits to rawhide binutils. > Build: binutils-2.31-18.fc40 I saw you making some builds, and I had a guess that you are most likely working on it :) binutils-2.31-18.fc40 didn't land in f40 as Bodhi CI gating marked it as failed. The failures don't seem to be related to binutils package itself. Seems like CI test is/was broken, or maybe a temporary network issue, or something else. Cheers, david > > Cheers > Nick > > -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
