Re: RISC-V ABI issue with ULEB128

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi David, Hi Florian,

Here's the bug:

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31179
RISC-V: The SET/ADD/SUB fix breaks ABI compatibility with 2.41 objects

It refers to this change in binutils 2.41:

https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=73d931e560059a87d76f528fafbb4270a98746bc

FYI, a second patch is also needed: "RISC-V: Clarify the behaviors of SET/ADD/SUB relocations."
This is commit: 2029e13917d53d2289d3ebb390c4f40bd2112d21


In Fedora/RISCV we typically end up using the latest available
binutils. We are slightly different from upstream/normal Fedora.

I have now backported both of the above commits to rawhide binutils.
Build: binutils-2.31-18.fc40

Cheers
  Nick

--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux