On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 03:41:54PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: [snip] > If there isn't anything wrong with the work of the other maintainer, > then I guess I don't understand. They did something in an honest > attempt to save you the trouble and because of unfortunate timing they > didn't actually save you any trouble. But you aren't in a different > position than if they hadn't tried to help. (Excluding the time it took > to start this discussion, of course.) I'm very much with Jason on this… It's a nice clean fix to FTBFS. If the maintainer did some work in parallel, then in the worst case they need to do a git pull and remove the patch. In general, I'd be very happy if somebody fixed an issue in one of my packages. Zbyszek -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue