Re: Proven to be sickened

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 03:41:54PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
[snip]
> If there isn't anything wrong with the work of the other maintainer,
> then I guess I don't understand.  They did something in an honest
> attempt to save you the trouble and because of unfortunate timing they
> didn't actually save you any trouble.  But you aren't in a different
> position than if they hadn't tried to help.  (Excluding the time it took
> to start this discussion, of course.)

I'm very much with Jason on this… It's a nice clean fix to FTBFS.
If the maintainer did some work in parallel, then in the worst case
they need to do a git pull and remove the patch. In general, I'd be
very happy if somebody fixed an issue in one of my packages.

Zbyszek
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux