On Mon, 2023-11-13 at 19:28 +0100, Thomas Haller wrote: > On Thu, 2023-08-10 at 12:37 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Thu, 2023-08-10 at 19:07 +0000, Chris Kelley wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > > > I have a GitHub Action > > > (https://github.com/dogtagpki/jss/actions/runs/5810230552/job/15794 > > > 978022) that fails due to a conflict between dnf and dnf5 when > > > using the rawhide docker image. I have been trying to keep up with > > > the dnf/dnf5 revert story, but I may have missed something about > > > the current state of affairs/expectations around it working without > > > issue. I am not sure to whom I should raise this issue, any > > > suggestions welcome - thanks! > > > > Not sure what the specific issue is here, but in general, we > > recommend > > against pulling from the Docker registry, as it is not updated very > > often. It's much better to pull from registry.fedoraproject.org or > > quay.io , as those are updated with every Rawhide compose. > > > Hi, > > It seems that https://registry.fedoraproject.org/repo/fedora/tags/ is > quite outdated (contrary to https://hub.docker.com/_/fedora ). > > This is quite bad, if I run > > podman run -ti fedora:39 > > it will get the image from registry.fedoraproject.org (due to > /etc/containers/registries.conf). The problem is, that this image is > from August and still points to Rawhide. So the first `dnf upgrade` > installs fc40 packages, which results in a broken installation. > > Workaround: > > podman run -ti docker.io/fedora:39 > > Is this a known issue? Am I doing something wrong? Where would I report > this? Neither I nor nirik can reproduce this as described. Note the web UI is basically just lies / incomplete info; I think it's telling you when the tag was created, not when the image behind it was last updated. This is what I get trying to reproduce: [adamw@xps13a Oneplus 9]$ podman run -ti fedora:39 Resolved "fedora" as an alias (/etc/containers/registries.conf.d/000-shortnames.conf) Trying to pull registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:39... Getting image source signatures Copying blob 6eb636413202 done | Copying config ec546109f8 done | Writing manifest to image destination [root@ee928f4eb27a /]# dnf update Fedora 39 - x86_64 31 MB/s | 89 MB 00:02 Fedora 39 openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_64 1.2 kB/s | 2.5 kB 00:02 Fedora 39 - x86_64 - Updates 393 kB/s | 12 MB 00:32 Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:01 ago on Mon Nov 13 19:00:36 2023. Dependencies resolved. ============================================================================================================================================================================================= Package Architecture Version Repository Size ============================================================================================================================================================================================= Upgrading: dnf noarch 4.18.1-1.fc39 updates 508 k dnf-data noarch 4.18.1-1.fc39 updates 39 k elfutils-default-yama-scope noarch 0.190-1.fc39 updates 14 k elfutils-libelf x86_64 0.190-1.fc39 updates 195 k elfutils-libs x86_64 0.190-1.fc39 updates 260 k gnupg2 x86_64 2.4.3-4.fc39 updates 2.6 M python3-dnf noarch 4.18.1-1.fc39 updates 589 k yum noarch 4.18.1-1.fc39 updates 37 k Transaction Summary ============================================================================================================================================================================================= Upgrade 8 Packages Total download size: 4.2 M Is this ok [y/N]: i.e. it's not a Rawhide image, updating uses F39 repos, and only a small number of updates is available (indicating the image is recent). -- Adam Williamson (he/him/his) Fedora QA Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @adamw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
