Re: Does a change approved for f39 need reapproval for f40?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 at 14:26, Aoife Moloney <amoloney@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Jonathan,

Sorry this (among other things Im sure) fell through the cracks while we were without a Fedora Program Manager :(

Yep, completely understandable. It wouldn't have been a problem if I had started the work sooner!


I will re-announce this on discourse as this is how the process for a change targeting F40 goes, and open a new ticket to FESCo after about a week or so, and thank you for cleaning up the wiki, it makes it much easier to see the discussion surrounding the change from its initial proposal for F39 by separating it out in the Current Status section. I'll remove the discussion links, tracker bug and fesco ticket for the F40 section and re-add with F40 links.

Great, thanks.
 


Kindest regards,
Aoife

On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 3:16 PM Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 10:55 AM Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 at 14:24, Ian McInerney via devel
> <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 2:06 PM Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> Well it looks like I took too long to do the deferral to F40, and so
> >> FESCO dropped the change:
> >> https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3059#comment-875144
> >>
> >> So now do I need to re-submit as a fresh change for F40?
> >
> >
> > My reading of the email replies to the FESCO minutes when they announced this (https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/thread/E3M624WQFJV4L5NCJBA3UC746Z7BWNO5/#TMIPXR25CJR72BUMXHKTVICUKVUU5REM) is that they want an entirely new change proposal for it... since they apparently didn't think anyone was working on it and that it was completely abandoned even though you had emailed that you were working on it.
>
> Drat. I finally have some time to pick up the work on it (having
> inherited the change from trodgers after he left) and now I can't do
> it! That's kinda annoying, as I had mailed the list about it. I
> probably should have updated the change to make myself the owner.
>
> Fingers crossed I'll still be able to make time for it after it gets
> re-approved. I'll submit a new change.

If it's substantially the same, just update the wiki page and ask
Aoife to create the FESCo ticket so we can approve it again.




--
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!



--

Aoife Moloney

Fedora Operations Architect

Fedora Project

Matrix: @amoloney:fedora.im

IRC: amoloney


_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux