On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 9:43 PM Ben Cotton <bcotton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 2:56 PM Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > This change got approved for f39 but couldn't be done in time: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F39ModernizeTBB > > > > Does it need to be re-proposed and approved for f40, or can we just do it now? (in a side tag, as planned, of course). > > No, just do it: > > > Changes that cannot be completed will automatically be deferred to the next release and do not require re-submission unless substantial revisions are made. Speaking with my packager and FESCo hats on, I think it would also still be OK to push the change to both F40 *and* F39, so there wouldn't even be a need to defer at all. If you want to go this route, it might be good to ask FESCo for guidance (i.e. file a ticket), but I think the likelihood that we'll just tell you "go ahead with the changes in both F40 and F39" is pretty high. :) Fabio _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
