Re: The new Change discussion process is painful

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Adam Williamson wrote:
> From there, it's up to people where they see and respond to them.

But every single announcement gets a reply on the mailing list (which is not 
properly threaded in KNode/Gmane, by the way) saying something like:

> The discussion thread to provide feedback for this change proposal can be 
> found here https://yaddayadda.example.com/blablabla

With this kind of wording, is it any wonder that people take that as 
mandatory and discussion on the mailing list has almost entirely drowned 
out? (The only Change that gets any discussion here seems to be the Plasma 6 
one, and only because it contains a completely outrageous downstream-only 
change hidden in the fine print, silently killing Plasma X11 support.)

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux