Re: SPDX MIT license , what todo ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On 08-09-2023 16:48, Sérgio Basto wrote:


done [1] thanks , btw another question I don't need do a new build
isn't it ?
No, since there was no license change - in your case not even the
specifier changed 😄

and if the license format changed , should we build a new release ? and
in all branches or just in rawhide ?

I believe, and Miroslav will correct me if I'm wrong, the script looks at the changelog and searches for SPDX. As long as there's a changelog entry, the package is considered migrated.

However, if the License: tag value changes, it is recommended to rebuild, so the new license makes it into the package. Of course, this can also be done with the next update or mass rebuild.

-- Sandro
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct:
List Guidelines:
List Archives:
Do not reply to spam, report it:

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux