Re: Adding Passim as a Fedora 40 feature?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 7 2023 at 12:55:03 PM +0200, Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Sure, but that means it will still be started on Fedora with default
configuration, unless I misunderstand something?

It will. D-Bus services are a little weird because they often ship systemd services but they're still effectively enabled by default even if the systemd service is disabled. The disabled preset means systemd *itself* will not activate the service, but dbus-broker still will. This is sort of an end run around the expectation that FESCo approve new services, but FESCo only approves systemd presets, and no preset is required for D-Bus services. And almost all desktop services are D-Bus services.

It's actually not *too* serious of a problem IMO, because packages generally make good decisions, and somebody is going to notice if something unwanted appears. But it's probably not what you're expecting if you're thinking that new services have to be approved.

Michael

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux