On Wed, 6 Sept 2023 at 19:12, Adam Williamson <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This message says you're "thinking of adding Passim", but in point of > fact, it appears to have been added to the package set already, and as > of fwupd-1.9.5-2.fc40 (built two days ago), fwupd hard requires it, It hard requires the -lib -- the daemon is a softer requirement ; see below. > Workstation installs even seems to try and auto-start it on user login: > Sep 06 02:27:08 fedora (passimd)[2647]: passim.service: Failed at step NAMESPACE spawning /usr/libexec/passimd: No such file or directory I'm confused why the service definition exists but not the binary -- to clarify -- you've got passim-libs installed, but *not* passim -- correct? > so...at this point, in Rawhide (not F39), this 'thinking of adding' > feature appears to be basically fully implemented already (except for > the service start failing). Was this intentional? It's intentional in that if the feature gets rejected I'd change the "Recommends" to a "Suggests". If you'd rather me do the opposite (i.e. move from Suggests to Recommends if the proposal gets accepted) that's 100% okay with me and I can do that tomorrow. Richard _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
