Re: Adding Passim as a Fedora 40 feature?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Wed, 6 Sept 2023 at 19:12, Adam Williamson
<adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This message says you're "thinking of adding Passim", but in point of
> fact, it appears to have been added to the package set already, and as
> of fwupd-1.9.5-2.fc40 (built two days ago), fwupd hard requires it,

It hard requires the -lib -- the daemon is a softer requirement ; see below.

> Workstation installs even seems to try and auto-start it on user login:
> Sep 06 02:27:08 fedora (passimd)[2647]: passim.service: Failed at step NAMESPACE spawning /usr/libexec/passimd: No such file or directory

I'm confused why the service definition exists but not the binary --
to clarify -- you've got passim-libs installed, but *not* passim --

> this point, in Rawhide (not F39), this 'thinking of adding'
> feature appears to be basically fully implemented already (except for
> the service start failing). Was this intentional?

It's intentional in that if the feature gets rejected I'd change the
"Recommends" to a "Suggests". If you'd rather me do the opposite (i.e.
move from Suggests to Recommends if the proposal gets accepted) that's
100% okay with me and I can do that tomorrow.

devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct:
List Guidelines:
List Archives:
Do not reply to spam, report it:

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux