On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 at 22:05, Björn Persson <Bjorn@rombobjörn.se> wrote: > The document doesn't say what design decisions were made based on the > assumption of a friendly network. Well, I can certainly add them -- this discussion was started so I can add any missing information. > All of those design decisions need to > be reconsidered with the assumption that there are attackers on the LAN > who will abuse Passim any way they can, and that Passim must deal > reasonably with any and all attacks. The fallback for being provided with data that doesn't match the SHA256 checksum is to download the file from the CDN. Richard _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
