Re: process to unretire/re-review package where some branches still exist?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 7:53 PM Pete Walter <walter.pete@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> 28.08.2023, 18:34, "Scott Talbert" <swt@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> On Mon, 28 Aug 2023, Mark E. Fuller wrote:
>
>
>  Hi all,
>
>  I'm trying to unretire golang-github-google-renameio-2 and have completed a
>  re-review.
>  However, since the package still exists in F37 and F38, the process for
>  getting the F39 and rawhide branches "back" and getting control of the
>  package repo is unclear.
>  Can anyone advise?
>
>
> It's just the normal process. The fact that F37 and F38 branches exist
> doesn't change anything. (Packages can't be retired in already-released
> versions, so that's why F37 and F38 branches still exist.)
>
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Retirement_Process/#claiming
>
>
> No, the process does not work like that in practice.
> I tried to unretire a few retired rust packages before the 2 month deadline passed where re-review is not needed, but Fabio Valentini told me that I cannot do that because he is still maintaining them for the f36 and f37 branches (it was several months ago). Releng agreed and refused to unretire the packages.
>
> https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11372
> https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11373
> https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11374
>
> I may have overreacted in the ticket but in my opinion this is an incredibly antisocial process where one person has the power to permanently retire something and then refuse to bring it back.
>
> I needed it for packaging fractal where as a result of being able to unretire them I had to bundle all dependencies. Same person tried to stop that as well... https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2223224

Can you please stop spreading lies about me?
Anybody can read these public tickets, and see that I didn't refuse
*anything* (other than having my maintainer rights taken away from me
*without my knowledge*), and that I offered help instead.

Fabio
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux