Re: SPDX Statistics - Voyager 2 edition

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dne 28. 08. 23 v 15:36 Richard Fontana napsal(a):
As for <ID>+ being valid SPDX syntax, can that be supported by
fedora-license-validate or whatever the tool is called today?
That's probably a good idea, though it would seem to be predicated on
us documenting that any "allowed" license identifier is still allowed
if it adds the `+` operator.

I filed issue https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues/308

Lets continue there.

-- 
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux