On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 10:39 PM Richard Fontana <rfontana@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 3:06 PM Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 1:21 PM Miroslav Suchý <msuchy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > rust-bitmaps warning: not valid neither as Callaway nor as SPDX, please check > > > > This uses MPL-2.0 or later, denoted as "MPL-2.0+". It looks like an > > SPDX identifier, but it's not (there is no "-or-later" variant of > > MPL-2.0 in SPDX). I'll investigate and file an issue with upstream. > > Jilayne can correct me if I'm wrong, but I am pretty sure `MPL-2.0+` > is a valid and semantically meaningful SPDX identifier. It is arguably > redundant since MPL-2.0 permits downstream relicensing to later > versions. It's not on the list though: https://spdx.org/licenses/ Also, cargo / crates.io even documents that licenses in crate metadata needs to be valid SPDX expressions and only things from SPDX license list are acceptable, so this isn't considered valid by crates.io either. Fabio _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
