* Demi Marie Obenour: > From this thread, it appears that non-LFS 32-bit software is fundamentally > unsupportable in the long run, just like software with 32-bit time_t is > unsupportable. That leaves two options: > > 1. Break the ABI, preferably in such a way that causes non-LFS > code to fail at load time rather than crashing. > > 2. Drop 32-bit support from the distribution altogether. > > It looks like trying to keep 32-bit non-LFS software working will be an > endless time sink and is not sustainable in the long term. My impression is different. It's btrfs that is a poor choice for people who want to run 32-bit software, have a lot of file creations/deletions, and do not want to reformat and reinstall periodically. The situation with XFS, for example, is different because you can supply the inode32 mount option and get 32-bit applications going again, maybe after making in-place copies of a few files. Thanks, Florian _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
