* Demi Marie Obenour: > On 7/17/23 09:51, Florian Weimer wrote: >> * Daniel P. Berrangé: >> >>>> But that still raises the question - why does it look like this >>>> started to happen pretty suddenly around June 30? >>>> The list of updates that were applied to builders in that timeframe >>>> doesn't raise any alarm bells (except maybe the 6.3 kernel): >>>> (see https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11531#comment-864471) >>>> I read the release notes for the 6.3 kernel but didn't see any >>>> mentions of BTRFS changes that could explain this. :( >>> >>> Or what 32-bit code is being run in the context of koji that is >>> NOT compiled with LFS ? Is this something silly like configure >>> script tests not enabling LFS, but the resulting applications >>> correctly using LFS ? >> >> A dependency used during RPM file creation, libcap, is not fully built >> in LFS mode. Once we fix that, we know that we'll run into issues with >> chkconfig and update-alternatives. It's a never-ending source of bugs. >> It's not a good use of maintainer time. >> >> We can't change the overall distribution flags with CFLAGS injection >> because doing so has ABI implications. > > Can they be changed at the next mass rebuild? Not if we want to maintain compatibility with non-Fedora software. It probably doesn't matter for most packages, but doing a per-package analysis is a lot of work. Thanks, Florian _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
