Hi all, I'm opening this thread to trigger discussion of the roadmap for DNF5 in Fedora 39 - whether the switch still looks doable for this release, or whether it should be reverted for F39 and postponed to F40. This is also being tracked in a FESCo ticket: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3039 The DNF5 Change was approved with the condition that bits that are important to the distribution *MUST* work, but this does not seem to be the case yet, six months after this was initially approved - there's at least a few things that are still using dnf-3 or have been broken since the switch to dnf5: - rawhide mock / koji builds still default to dnf-3 (DNF 4) - Fedora CI has been partially broken since the switch to DNF5 (c.f. [fedora-ci/general#416](https://pagure.io/fedora-ci/general/issue/416)), making CI results for bodhi updates at least partially useless - fedora-review has been broken since the switch to DNF5 (c.f. [FedoraReview#482](FedoraReview/issue/482)), which is really hurting the rate at which new packages are getting reviewed and added to Fedora - (not an exhaustive list, feel free to mention other things, I will update the list to include them) We are now mere days before the Fedora 39 mass rebuild is scheduled to start, so I think it's time to start talking about the roadmap for getting missing pieces into place for Fedora 39, or if that is not possible within this timeframe, whether the contingency mechanism should be enacted. Fabio _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
